It‘s not a vulnerability nor a security issue! It’s just a use case you don’t like. That’s all, don’t pretend otherwise! Don’t get me wrong, I also think that inscriptions are useless, but the difference is that I don’t tell people how to use bitcoin.

Learn to read. Or code. Or whatever it is impacting your ability to understand that this IS a vulnerability.

Can I ask for clarification for what Core is vulnerable to? What are the ramifications for never fixing this vulnerability?

Bypass of datacarriersize limit using OP_FALSE,OP_IF Ramifications are that datacarriersize, an important node policy parameter, is bypassable. I.e. a bug that makes an option in core not behave as intended.

Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures - Bitcoin Wiki

$boost You just don't know what you're talking about. Allowing anyone to insert that much malicious code is a vulnerability. Whether jpegs or something more malicious. In his heyday John McAfee would have a ball with this. Exposing privacy and damaging security lol. You don't have a clue what the shadowy "supercoders" can do. And we absolutely do have a say, and an obligation as to what people do with Bitcoin. Not your keys, not your Bitcoin. Not your protocol, not your Bitcoin..😐