Saying "honey is healthy, but sugar is unhealthy" is like saying "blockchain is interesting, but #Bitcoin is uninteresting".
#Peatstr
Login to reply
Replies (26)
Sugar is poison
People who say processed sugar is the same as honey are delusional
It's refined sugar that's bad. But the sugar naturally found inside fruit is excellent.
Honey is 99% sugar.
That's completely backwards...
Honey is 99% sugar, so how can it be healthy?
Pundits don't know that.
It's true that honey contains a lot of sugar, but it also has nutrients and health-giving properties. However, even honey should be consumed in moderation.
It's not processed tho, it's bee vomit, much better
Do you know that people who can’t eat or drink in hospital get IV fluids - every 24 hours 1 litre of saline (salt water) and 2 litres of dextrose (glucose water) 😃
Did you just compare sugar with bitcoin? :D
No, I didn't know that. But I think sugar, like everything else, is better in moderation.
It is true that sugar in fruit always comes with potassium which means that it does not blood sugars spikes and insulin release .
Laser, since you’re already down this rabbit hole, it’s worth checking out Darko Velcek’s work. He publishes weekly on YouTube, BitChute, and Rumble, and he tends to be quite repetitive. If you watch any one of his videos, you’ll more or less get the main idea.
Torn on this. Even though the macronutrients are similar, might be important differences not captured solely by that. Just instinctively seems like raw honey *has* to be better for you than processed sugar.
Honey has additional benefits, but the 1% of honey that makes it unique is not the only thing healthy about honey; the sugar contained in the other 99% is pure energy.
On a time line of human existence we simply would not as a species had access to "sugar" in large amounts, obviously varies annually andby regions. Sugar in any meaningful amount can only be a recent phenomena and so i'd be surprised if it was a basis for good health long term and across populations🤷♀️
Are you under the impression that sugar is a new phenomenon to human civilization?
I think with sugar you have to say the quantity makes the poison
Every single nutrient, including water and sun, is like that.
True!
Not in the slightest. You’re making blanket statements without any nuance. Your statements don’t hold up to scrutiny. Try this, why is honey healthy?
Okay.
note1lfvj3h979rzzy2k7nlaquvkadl0nqvzj77d7dd28ywekp7tkr3js0zkupq
I see both sides. On the one hand, sugar is pure energy, on the other, it’s a concentrated form we never evolved to deal with in nature.
Like chewing a coca leaf is a nice stimulant that gave people in the Andres energy, extracting and refining the essence is cocaine.
Same with high-fructose corn syrup. It’s not corn, it’s not even the corn we’ve bred to be extra sweet, it’s the extracted sugar from the extra sweet corn.
So what about honey — that’s concentrated sugar, extracted from flowers by bees. But honey has been around forever, and the concentrating process happens naturally.
Not trying to provide an answer so much as how I see the question.
I agree that the human body is unprepared to tolerate HFCS, which cannot even exist without an extreme industrial process.
But what about evaporated cane juice?
Closer call, same with fresh squeezed orange juice. Nothing wrong with the ingredients or process. Only question is whether we’ve evolved to tolerate the concentration of dose. Maybe *some* of us have, others haven’t.
In the quantity we have today. Yes.