nomadshiba⚡⚡'s avatar
nomadshiba⚡⚡ me@nomadshiba.me 1 month ago
you didnt give any reasons, made up arguments. its ok to not know things, you dont have to try hard to appear correct. you are constantly lying about how kaspa works and its cryptography, using meaningless jargon to appear more qualified or feel better. read the whole thread. if you are gonna support kaspa at least learn how it actually works. image
↑ Parent

Replies (6)

WildBill's avatar
WildBill 1 month ago
Haha the AI just told you you were wrong about the math.
WildBill's avatar
WildBill 1 month ago
And sure, if you’re running no downloads on Bitcoin since 2010… give me a break.
WildBill's avatar
WildBill 1 month ago
If you don’t agree with a fork, you don’t sync. That’s flatly plain. Idk why that’s contentious.
WildBill's avatar
WildBill 1 month ago
If you don’t like the syncing node, don’t run it. It’s that simple.
WildBill's avatar
WildBill 1 month ago
Without a 51% attack, the MuHash written in the header is unchangeable, and the UTXO snapshot matching that MuHash is unforgeable. Does Kaspa have consensus at the moment? Yes. And if your argument is what happens when it doesn’t have consensus? Same as BTC in years past. Don’t run the syncing node if you’re worried about consensus.
↑