I used to teach critical thinking and math to students of all ages at a supplemental learning center for years. My students won awards at national math and critical thinking test competitions every year in increasing quantities. Other than the students who earned medals, all of my students, as a whole, outperformed both national and international averages every year in increasingly larger margins each year. Our learning center was the exact opposite of the Prussian model. We didn't treat our students in a one-size-fits-all way. We neurologically profiled each of our students to inform our efforts to lovingly tailor the curriculum and our interactions to each unique individual in ways best suited for their development and success.

Replies (1)

Lucas M's avatar
Lucas M 1 month ago
Do you still keep in contact with the center? I'm only asking because I'm curious if the educational quality has stayed the same, degraded, or has perhaps improved. Sometimes it degrades when a larger number students begin attending. Not always, of course. My kids attend a co-op that uses a unit study-based curricula system. In the usage of neurological profiling per individual student, it's very similar to what you described.