If funding is affected then board seats will be more likely to change. My guess is the outraged individuals are not primary funding sources and will have little impact on the org.

Let's say @DETERMINISTIC OPTIMISM 🌞 is hostile to anyone opposing his business moat when they apply to @OpenSats. Which 4 other board members share the same interest that enables this bias? Let's be specific and name names. They are all publicly listed. The easiest is @ODELL since he's invested in CoinKite. Who are the other 3 and why would they be biased?

Why are you so defensive towards NVK's position on the Board? If something is only 89% as good as it could be and we both can understand the community's concerns, why would improving it be so contentious? Additionally NVK doesn't need to vote to have a chilling effect. He can make his false accusations against project's merits before abstaining as he's done numerous times in public. This chilling effect is not needed and could be improved with a less troll candidate. Before naming names, is there a way I can look at voting records or secretary recorded discussions from subcommittees? As you've stated I don't have insider knowledge of how OpenSats is being operated but I can certainly see how others are perceiving their operations and thus my concerns. If I can research that then I'd be happy to include names.