rioters* drug* times* because* cared about* legitimization* life sentences* law system* fix anything* And most importantly the legal case you are so vehemently upset over is Ulbricht* Vs. The United States Of America. His name is not Ullman. It is Ulbricht. Pardon my corrections. Everyone here can tell how much of an expert you are on the case and ethics in general. Except in America hosting and operating a website is not the same thing as dealing drugs. Also just so you know ethics and legality are distinct and seperate things. But I'm sure you already knew that.

Thanks a lot for your help with english and his name. My bad. So Amazon ist just a website then? Not a market. I mean when what you tell is true there are several websites like the silk road in America and the owners do not have to hide. Can you kind of see that your argumentation is a bit far from common sense? Because most laws base in some part on ethics and morality. This is why I mention them.