BitcoinIsFuture's avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 3 months ago
Because its incorrect. Bitcoin policy is meant for that. The Constitution does not ban hate speech and rightfully so. The Constitution protects free speech. (the consensus in Bitcoin terms) Hate speech is filtered out via peoples Culture and Values. Those are the filters. But society needs free speech. Hate speech is like a spam but you don't ban it, you don't censor it, you filter it out. You don't need 100% removal again because of freedom of speech.
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar BitcoinIsFuture
Freedom is for everyone. Freedom of speech is for everyone. Bitcoin Freedom Money is for everyone. Freedom of choice is for everyone.
View quoted note →

Replies (1)

With enough guns your constitution is worthless. Bitcoin is different. I am on the conservative side when it comes to filters, meaning that I prefer OP_RETURN to ideally stay at 80 bytes. However, inscriptions and spam can only be *conclusively* disallowed at the consensus level. How is this wrong?