in which dystopia do you want to live that would solve for that? You have the same reasoning as every paper pusher gives for chat control or anything else.
pick an extreme case that is completely unpreventable by law unless everyone is monitored 24/7/365 and denied any private thought and freedom of speech.
Bad things will always happen. Bad people will always be around. You cannot outlaw human nature.
Laws only constrain and limit good actors, not bad ones. People wanting to talk shit will always talk shit. You will only punish and imprison the ones who expressed an opinion that isn't aligned with your current narrative and approved by your state's thought police.
Replies (2)
> You have the same reasoning as every paper pusher gives for chat control or anything else.
Absolutely not, in fact I'm strongly agains chat control.
You didn't respond to my example.
Can you solve that situation? If yes, how?
you also didn't answer the first part of that - which dystopian governmental overreach you're advocating for that would solve that particular problem?
if a teacher is doing it in public then remove the teacher? if it happens in private you can't do anything about it anyway so your problem is just a mental masturbation to create public outrage because of course every measure taken is there to protect the poor kid. Even tho the kid will still get fucked, equally it not more. Except that his cousin will also end up in jail because he tweeted about something you dont like.
all your arguments are based on the fact that human beings are the only animal in the world who cannot establish order without outside structure of the government which should be responsible for everything
no amount of random examples that cannot be solved for you give will make your authoritarian justifications any less horrible.
