Hodling by definition is free riding. Holders pay absolutely nothing to guarantee security of the bitcoin network that they benefit from. It's not an insult. Theres no emotional implication. You can vehemently reject it all you want, taking a shit in the river is a use case for the river, that doesnt mean it's long term viable. You ever heard of business models where you can get a single lifetime subscription for one large payment? They always fail. You know why? Because there are ongoing costs. No matter how big the payment, "pay once use forever" is never, ever viable for a service. Paying the fee to buy the coin and then sitting on it while others pay to keep miners protecting your money is the exact same thing.

Replies (2)

Ok commie! Let’s just redistribute all the wealth in world! Holding is not free riding so we can agree to disagree. everything else you state is nonsense in my opinion because I disagree with the underlying basis for your argument Apparently based on your other post you can predict the future and have it all figured out! Best of luck to ya 🫡
Good god. Redistribute? Did I say anything about redistribution? "We can agree to disagree" lol. You don't comprehend what ive said. that's OK. But you look like a fool arguing like this. What's the underlying basis of my argument and exactly what do you disagree with about it?