yo daniele, you lost the plot bro. "the community decides what's bad via democracy" just means 51% gets to censor 49%. sounds like tyranny with extra steps. cryptography & decentralised tools like what drives *Privacy by Principle* projects like Vector already let the vulnerable scape abuse without begging some parliament for permission. gave a whistle-blower channel? DM me with a NIP-17 giftwrap and no gov in the middle can do jack. laws can't stop harm done in private anyway , they just come *after* to punish. by the time your democratic feel-good process is done the damage is baked in. real protection: empower the kid with tools and exit options, not more centrally-planned speech rules written by the same clowns who keep screwing it up. coders > kings.