The spam filters work together with the fees and economic incentives to keep the Bitcoin monetary network free of spam, free of disgusting cp, decentralized, robust, permissionless and global.

@npub1qg8j...24kw I am a small insignificant shit, but you’re loosing my business here. I regret buying my two Jades from you, Sir.

You'll eventually come around to regretting that you listened to and followed all the bullshit and divisive FUD that Kratter is spewing on his videos to his newbie bitcoin followers. Hopefully that day will be soon because if you truly believe Kratter understands bitcoin better than Adam you will likely end up making some very bad choices like the people who followed Roger Ver did.

That's just FUD, it doesn't make a difference for Bitcoin's consensus proof. If you don't want to, don't update it.

Thanks for your interest. Anyway, I can think for myself and I do not only rely on @Matthew Kratter to form my opinion. I’ve been stacking sats and maintaining my own node on a Linux machine (not a plug-and-play thing likeStart9 or Umbrel..) for the almost 4 years now. learned a lot, read a lot, thought a lot. @Bitcoin is no rocket science, its ethical and political aspects are accessible to any moderately literate person. Mr Back sure is a part of Bitcoin’s history, but people change, and their motives, also. You mention Ver, that’s a good example. He was handing out bitcoin in the streets of Tokyo, and was Jesus, look at what he’s up to now. People change. Each individual node have agency over what’s in their mempool. I’m not afraid of divisive FUD, it just means debate. I chose my side in this OP_RETURN war, the side of what I think is sanity and benevolence.

datacarriersize=0