- I DO NOT THINK THERE WILL BE MOTIVATION TO ACTIVATE A SOFT FORK TO “IMPROVE SELF CUSTODY” UNTIL FEE RATES RISE
- I DO NOT THINK WE WILL HAVE A SOFT FORK THAT IS EVEN REMOTELY CONTENTIOUS AND STAKEHOLDERS ARE MORE DIVERSE THAN THEY HAVE EVER BEEN
- IN THIS ENVIRONMENT AND GOING FORWARD I ACTUALLY LEAN TOWARD RESPONSIBLE HARD FORKS WITH FIVE YEAR OUT FLAG DAYS
- THIS CONVERSATION SHOULD BE HAPPENING ON NOSTR, NOT X
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Whats this 2nd point?
Not clear as worded.
Glad to see you say something about concrete about ways to improve the protocol 👍
"responsible hard forks" FTW
bring it 🗣️
Do all the "L2's" pegged to Bitcoin skyrocket fees to make things uncomfortable enough?
How technically literate are relevant stakeholders, from your perspective, to have good opinions on what is contentious?
We hard fork inevitably, do we hard fork once to fix the technical issues (timestamp) and add other things? Or do you see mutliple hard forks over the years? Why five years? Why not 10? why not 1?
🎯

