Replies (12)
The problem is you don't have concensus... ๐ฅด
Softforks almost never have consensus.
RDTS has more than sufficient support, though.
Thats not true though is it... every soft fork until now signalled clear majority concensus. 70%+ nodes run Core, so to propose a softfork like this is ridiculous and is by definition a contentious fork...
Consensus is 100%, not a majority.
And ~60% support RDTS.
If BIP110's purpose is to curb spam, spammers will find a way around it. Then you'll be stuck in a viscious circle of having an authority tell you what is spam or what isn't, and have a central repository (Luke's) for updating and maintaing filters. That's how adblockers work, for example.
Didn't you read what I just said? You are also stuck in the nirvana/strawman double fallacy. Honest question. Have you even read the BIP documentation?
The entire reason you have a 55% threshold is because you know it doesn't have enough support you toothless midget.
60% do not support RDTD.
Liar
60% is what recent data shows. Feel free to do your own analysis.
Miners do not control the network.
I didn't say they did spook.
The data you made up in your head maybe.
