This comes across as cope.
A dollar bill can be scribbled on to a point it is no longer usable as money and a monument can be defaced so badly it is no longer recognisable.
We've seen what happens when you reduce efforts against people who attack our monuments and open the door to them. They pull them down and throw them in rivers, or melt them down in furnaces, destroyed forever.
When some radicals attack your monuments you don't throw your hands up and say maybe it just wasn't as valuable as we thought, you increase patrols and throw out harsh penalties to make it harder for them.
Core are doing the former and trying to negotiate with terrorists instead of the latter and telling them to fuck off and doing what they can to prevent harm.
It the same suicidal altruism and cowardice that has destroyed the West playing out here. Grow a backbone and defend the good thing we have before it's ruined.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
One does not need cope if one does not perceive a problem. I'm bullish on bitcoin as it is.
I think it's as valuable as we thought. However, when I see arguments that JPEGs are a problem, I can only assume they fear it's not as valuable as they thought. Otherwise I don't think they'd view it as a problem.
I would oppose consensus changes to make it easier to put more non-monetary stuff into the timechain. But that's not what Core has proposed; they just don't see a purpose to make relaying more restrictive than what can be mined.
Attempting to filter what people are willing to pay for and what fits within current consensus, is a pretty Sisyphean activity in my view.
That is the way 🤜
Grow a backbone everyone
nevent1qqsd32qyazka34r0thq4c837k4ff26m9xcjd9643ek9th9nd2u7c6ss76h3pu
Filters don’t prevent the harm, at all.
They make the problem WORSE, by discouraging them from putting the spam in the least harmful place- OP_RETURN.