Yes we definitely need more transparency (which I thought it was our imperative as Bitcoiners): who did what? What was the vote count? How are decision taken?
On one side I can understand that devs don’t want every move they make be scrutinized as this might “slow down” their technical job, but if you want to be a bitcoin dev you have to be accountable to the people and have a open and transparent approach
Login to reply
Replies (3)
GitHib PRs are for technical discussions, not political or strategic or anything else that is not actually part of solvong the issue at hand. It just gets too complicated to mix those discussions in a forum that doesn't handle large discussions well.
To be clear, I am all for the debates to rage about changes to Bitcoin! I am still making up my mind on the current issues, and I want the points discussed! Nostr seems to me to be the ideal place for open and free discourse.
Yes, because designing solutions without being clear on what problem you are trying to solve, who your stakeholders are and what they require, is a good way to build a great product. /sarcasm