> There is literally nothing in his post that is bullshit.
- soft forks without consensus result in a chainsplit
- bcash was a hard fork with minority support so it trended to zero
Login to reply
Replies (2)
1. That's not what he said. Also define consensus there's two different consensuses at play here.
2. Wait Bcash had majority support and still lost? Interesting. I didn't know being influential ACTUALLY makes you the majority.
The CSAM stuff is a red herring but that post was accurate.
Guys JUST refute him on the merits and this would be over.