Default avatar
npub1hux5...vmz0 1 year ago
You're dodging the main point You're accusing others of being western-centric when you're literally pushing a crypto that prices out everyone other than westerners being able to use it in a sovereign manner now, but especially as time goes on. "That’s a feature - not a bug. It’s how the network guarantees security. If you don’t understand that is inevitable then you’re not qualified to discuss." It doesn't matter if you think it's a feature - it's a fact that you even admit is true and the inevitable outcome. Pricing out the rest of the world. "Those people earning less than $10 a day are never going to access the base layer - they couldn’t afford to today." Dude you're just making my argument for me. Yes, thanks for admitting again that only westerners can afford to use Bitcoin. We already established that. And conveniently ignore those that will be pushed out as fees continue rising.
↑ Parent

Replies (1)

StackSats.IO's avatar
StackSats.IO StackSatsIO@nostr.com.au 1 year ago
I’m not pushing “a crypto”. There is Bitcoin, and then there’s a bunch of wannabe imitators that aren’t worth shit. There is only one digital money that works. It doesn’t work the way you want it to work - boofuckinghoo. It works. It seperates money and state which is what it needs to do. Not everyone will be able to interact with it on the base layer - that doesn’t mean we need your shitcoin; it means we need different scaling options which is going to look different in other cultures which operate on different trust models to Western countries. So no I’m not making your argument for you, you’re making some retarded argument for some unknown shitcoin that I DGAF about because money converges to one and that one was already decided 15 years ago. Take your noise elsewhere.
↑