See, you fall for Slopp's manipulations. Spam forms currently more than 40% of Bitcoin's transactions. Large OP_RETURNs just give more options to the spammers. It does not fix inscriptions or ordinals or any other form of spam. image

Replies (1)

Did you miss the “since” part? > since block height 930,600 (Core v30 release) How is that “manipulative”? It seems very clear to me. Why did spammers go to all of the trouble of creating inscriptions, which store data in non-prunable UXTO records, instead of OP_RETURN, which can be pruned off?