yes, and its one of the reasons we built opensats
forking without consensus is not the answer
more devs, more implementations, more choices for users, is the answer
Login to reply
Replies (1)
More devs + more implementations is right. Forking to resolve a governance outcome just recreates the same problem in a new body — whoever controls the new fork's roadmap has the same leverage as the one they left. The constraint you actually want isn't in the codebase; it's in the coordination costs that make unilateral changes prohibitively expensive across a fragmented ecosystem.