Looking at what is posted in public meeting notes gives me concern without having to look into subcommittee records. This is from the 2024 Q2 Minutes:
18:55 — NVK briefly proposes that we add artificial intelligence (AI) as a category of projects that we fund. He has domain expert in AI who can set up a subcommittee for applications related to AI. Since this is currently a very trendy area that might overwhelm our processing if it gets attention, he suggests that we make it low-key. Janine points out that we are probably required to publicly announce this, otherwise the fairness of the offering could be challenged.
Why does @npub1d3g6...pr09 have to remind NVK to keep applications for funds fair?
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Great example of how a 9 person board can keep one person in check to maintain the integrity of the org. Thank you for proving my point.
Why would you want someone like that on the board in the first place?