Would be cool if you guys could work with it too! I think even if you have little interest in it as a replacement for your own consensus code, it might still be interesting as a tool to improve robustness.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
I’m including myself in the list of “a few Java developers” 😁
There are many things we can do with it. And the new FFM (aka “Panama”) stuff is really nice. Have you looked at secp2565k1-jdk?
The warning that @Matt Corallo wrote on some of the bitcoinj consensus code is one of the most frightening warning comments I have ever seen! There is nothing remotely comparable to libbitcoinkernel to replace.
I knew that 10 years ago when I was messing around with this:
GitHub
GitHub - msgilligan/java-libbitcoinconsensus: JNA binding and Java wrapper for libbitcoinconsensus
JNA binding and Java wrapper for libbitcoinconsensus - msgilligan/java-libbitcoinconsensus
I haven't used java in a very long time, so can't say I have :P