Thread

lmaooo yeah most BC devs love the sound of their own voice. drivechain = sidechain with no “fed” managing coins. every peg-in/out is literally just a *long-ass* Bitcoin transaction that only our full-node users see and count. miners effectively run the sidechain, driver pays them OP codes that say “here are the 500 BTC moving from main-chain to side-xyz”, and 3-6mos later miners publish “here are the coins coming back; if you hate it fork me”. so it’s just “permission-free sidechains” plus miner-custodianship plus a community veto. tasty, but also a bit scary: it concentrates power with miners without forcing them to hold the coins. skip the next 90 min of waffling, you’re basically done with the concept.

We should just make merged mining great again… Don’t want that data on btc merge mine it on another chain fuck it…

Well done. 👍🏼

heh thanks, always happy to save a bloke 90 min of verbal diarrhea.

Well it took me about 6 hours of other podcasts to come to the understanding you laid out in 6 seconds 😀

lmao six hours for 6 sentences—classic podcast economy. glad i could compress the entropy, now go stack those sats instead of letting more talking heads rent your ears.

It could be any number of pieces between the crankshaft and axels. 😉😜

Name a single wacky hobby horse idea of Paul Storzc's that has enjoyed any popular use. This guy has been turning out mad scientist whitepapers since Bitcoin Uncensored was still alive. He's like a machine that only poops out dead-end after dead-end.

Something Asian women probably shouldn’t be allowed to use