Thread

🤮

No problem. I'm good. I just find this stuff fascinating.

I am blown away how many people who use nostr and bitcoin are still feeding this garbage.

Somebody got murdered in cold blood in front of his family for exercising his First Amendment free speech. Nostr's entire purpose is to technologically guarantee free speech. Of course people on nostr are disturbed by it. Where do you think you are dude?

It was not for exercising his first amendment right to free speech It was perhaps while doing that, but not for doing that

Did they? How do you know that? You have been tricked. Stop watching the play and reacting to it. Make your own stage. This is what "they" want. It's a show. Turn it off. Or not. You do you. I just think it's funny watching you all. So predictable. I know where I am. Do you know where you are?

The point of the post is to channel this moment into something positive. Regardless of your theory of the crime it is clear that the only reason they would want to kill Charlie is to chill his speech. If you believe it was Israel, then they most likely killed him to stop criticism of Israel. If you believe it was a leftist, same difference but with probably some kind of transgender ideology nonsense. You look like a homeless guy that just woke up from a coma so I would be surprised if you know where you are but ya you got everything figured out and you can definitely bench 2 plates dude. Thank you for your wisdom. Keep it up thank you for enlightening me.

The killer inscribed antifa and trans idealogy talking pounts on the bullet. His only real claim to fame was talking on camera and engaging in debate Whats your evidence it was "not for doing that"? 🤣

Stop watching the news.. That's the whole note. Read it again.

I would say it was for stuff like supporting Trump and fomenting violence

I have no theory.

My coma lasted about 20 years. I woke up about 8 years ago I would say.

When did Charlie foment violence?

Supporting Trump, Israel, etc.

Thats a huge stretch. If supporting a policy or a government or a policy is violence then the entire planet is fair game.

I feel your passion. I am just sharing mine. Different POV. https://cdn.satellite.earth/4f93807fb3804a8c2fcf22bc62505748c9bd389a5c4dc435ef37add5ce40ff3a.mp4

I've never supported walling kids in and starving them And I've never supported restricting free speech or echo chambering people to foment violence either Charlie Kirk's crimes against humanity are not mine

If youve ever supported a war you are guilty of the same transgressions If youve ever supported myriad government policies you are guilty of the same transgression It is not a death sentence

Incorrect None of the wars or government policies I've supported are the same as genocide or religious fascism

You probably do but you're just intellectually dishonest. Vax mandates? Genocidal and massive human rights violation Ukraine war? One of the bloodiest wars ever I don't know your positions and don't care but it's very unlikely that you don't hold a position that would put you in the crosshairs the same way Charlie was. Charlie did not deserve to die and you are deeply misguided for thinking otherwise.

Vaccine mandates are not genocidal or a human rights violation And I didn't tell Russia to invade Ukraine but I don't think they're doing genocide anyway so WTF would that have to do with this if I did

You equate speech with action. it would be unreasonable for me to argue his words aren't support in some specific case. But what you endorse is vigilante death penalty for your interpretation of words. The logical conclusion is a person who lies to their captor to escape deserves to be shot by a human rights advocate who hears those words and chooses sides for that reason. And yet in this case he spoke out truthfully about authentic opinions that are only unpopular to people who do not remember the world as it was only 20 years ago, for the most part.

It's a lot simpler than that: kill one too many kids kids (even with words) and I stop caring if you get killed

That discredits you to thinking adults.

Debatable whether the ones who consider this discrediting are among the ones who think. I'll recognize that they are, but so am I

There is no such thing as a thinking adult who believes he killed someone, even with words. That you went there is at best disingenuous. If it's not disingenuous, it's a mental issue.

He did kill people with his words, like many (or perhaps all) other Nazis do too

But everyone kills with words, what makes Charlie different is the people he killed were kids walled in and starving

I can only make that make sense if you are talking about Sunny Philly, so I'm blocking you.

I have no idea who Sunny Philly is but good riddance

#GM Fren 🌞 have an amazing day today https://youtu.be/wqCz3-v3PHA