I understand what direct action means. Cypherpunks build cryptographic tools as direct action against authoritarians who are actually oppressing people. Direct action makes sense against those committing violence against others or destroying their property.
BUT direct action is not meant to be used against people who simply hold different opinions and aren't factually harming anyone. Going to someone's property to burn things and expose attendees isn't targeting oppressors - it's targeting people for their ideas and associations.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
You can use any action against anyone you dislike, and without a government to arbitrate, if you can defend yourself, you get away with it. Someone disagreeing with what I just said appeals to a government by your logic.
Destruction of property is violent.