i can't really agree since i'd be happy without them, and i suspect many users haven't even interacted with the GNU tools
i've done void/musl and gentoo with clang tooling, uutils over core, and more
i admire distros like alpine which stray away from GNU stuff,
and they've all been lovely, certainely not unrecognizable
and i've tried BSD varients for a similar purpose π‘
when i reccomend linux, what i like about linux is really truly the kernel, the variety of devices and drivers it supports, as well as the speed and development that goes into optimizing it for desktop use (ex NTSYNC & wine)
definitely not the GNU tools or the kernel's license: i typically dislike copyleft licenses used in GNU projects (like the GPL-2.0-only on the linux kernel for example)
it's not like i hate GNU or anything, i just don't think that it has as much impact on people's computer usage than they'd like to proclaim
i'd be more open to calling it GNOME-KDE/linux or X11-wayland/linux since those projects have more impact on my daily use
personally, when i log on to my PC, i don't care if a background script is using `grep` or `ripgrep` if you know what i mean πΉ
i'm a big fan of stallman though, i follow him on the mastodon side
what a champion of free software he is, although we disagree on a few things ππ
a long response, but i thought i should explain why i intentionally choose to say "linux" without the "GNU/"
much love π
P.S. my favourite GNU tool is cat for obvious reasons π»πββ¬
(screen too, before i swapped for tmux)
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Thanks for your time to explain your reasoning. Totally understand your point.
> i typically dislike copyleft licenses used in GNU projects (like the GPL-2.0-only on the linux kernel for example)
Why you dislike copyleft? Isnβt it a good way to develop transparent software and boost costumizability and compatability?
i think that FOSS should focus on freedom, infectious (copyleft) licenses force developers to change the licensing on their own code, thus acting against freedom
same thing with the forced attribution found in many licenses (even "permissive" ones)
FOSS in my opinion should be about releasing code to the public without expecting a return (modified code/attribution) or imposing rules (forced license change)
that's why my favourite license is the 0BSD (also submitting the code into the public domain, in applicable regions)