There should be some marginal attribution of each of the zaps your received. Let's say if Jack boosts you a lot more marginal impressions and zaps, he should get a zap share somewhat proportionally amounting to it. A new bot account with no follows shouldn't get any amount. == What do you guys think about the game theory of this for big accounts? - Will they have too strong of an incentive to just keep boosting other notes? - Would it be wrong to do so? - -> I'm thinking it could be a great force for decentralization; similar to the Joe Rogan podcast giving spotlight to new interesting people.

Replies (1)

Hmm. The ripple effect. I medium like it, maybe that's something that Prism could build in. However, I don't fully like it because it then takes away from others who share the note too. It's not as inclusive then, catering to larger followings. I'd probably be okay with a configuration that allows you to choose to enable ripples or not. For now, I think it's fine this way.