I wasn't saying that Nostr is small. I think it is a good size for any service provider to play the game. But the apps themselves are way too small for payment integrations. And they will always be small. Apps on Nostr are like Watch faces. They don't have the time to build the supporting infrastructure to redirect cash. On the second point, yes, people trust Amethyst more than a service they never heard about, but that is fixed when Amethyst recommends services in a settings page. We pass the trust we have to providers. If we just code a WoT settings screen where you are one of the providers, users will click on it and create an account with you. The better the integration, the better the capture. That's also why I think we need to have WoT-visualization clients whose only job is to "sell" how web of trust is better than everything else. Then users just need to pick a provider and use in all apps.

Replies (1)

> “I am skeptical whether the end user would actually pay for such low-level primitives that every social media app has built-in” @Pip the WoT guy > “Well, I have a client and won't pay. It doesn't make sense for me to pay for any service on behalf of my users.” @Vitor Pamplona I think you’re both missing the WoT value prop … but in different ways. Users will pay to access WoT powered recommendations and discovery for the same reason that they pay for AI credits … but don’t pay for Google. Clients will pay for WoT services (on behalf of their users) NOT by representing the user’s npub directly but by providing their own npub’s (value added?) take on “content and user curation” … for users who DONT wish to “bring their own WoT provider” (or don’t have one). Why? Because FULLY realized WoT powered content and user discovery WILL BLOW PEOPLES MINDS … and everybody will want a piece of it. I mean … that’s just my optimistic take.