We have a lot of super positive reviews on Autoclaw, so I don't really understand why it's so expensive for your particular use case. I think your bot must be literally checking the balance after every single query, and that may be consuming many more tokens than necessary. Openclaw in general is a giant money hole, which is why we created Autoclaw. It does vastly reduce costs, but you have to be mindful of how it's being used. Each of you has different use cases, so it's hard for me to answer exactly what's going on in both situations. Eluc, I would recommend you look into our Nostr Wallet Connect integration. If you do that, you don't have to check balance ever. We will simply pull payments when you run low on our side.

Replies (3)

I guess I don't understand how Openclaw and agent are working. I thought if I asked to do a program that check an API every hours, then the program run without agent to ask anything to the model, so. But I guess it's not the case. I know for NWC but I don't like the idea that it draw sats without my approval, so if something strange is happening like 5 bucks got killed in minutes, I can stop and figure out. But I guess with proper limits it might be acceptable once I trust the tool to not go crazy. Then I cannot imagine when I will deploy all thr automation I planned for, checking message, emails, calendars and a lot more. I would better ask it to program n8n to run outside the agent or something.
โ†‘