Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 14
Generated: 03:37:39
There were only about ~700 non-standard OP returns on-chain previous to this PR, and now as this PR is coming to fruition, just on nostr:nprofile1qy08wumn8ghj7en9v4j8xtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0wphhqatvv9eqzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqqg8plualm48yqv2etxcgkn7vsfz74fg5vdlp6nkz4ctxkapngxlp4uypp6uv 's node there are 2000 non-standard tx's waiting to be mined at this moment. And people are saying removing the filter won't increase spam? Just the mere act of saying they would remove it has increased spam by an order of magnitude. Core is completely corrupt if they do not own up to the mistake and reverse course.
2025-05-07 19:27:44 from 1 relay(s) 2 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (14)

Which is something you might do as an individual, but it's pretty obvious that bitcoin implementations aren't going to hardcode every single miner into the peerlist of every single node. So realistically, whether you have a spammy workaround or not, the implementation that most nodes run matters and the filters still matter.
2025-05-07 20:26:18 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 2 replies ↓ Reply
AND... they would pay more if they need a private mempool to do it. disincentives. You can run circles around this all day, but the reason we're gonna go 1000x on OPreturn spam in the next few weeks, is solely because of Bitcoin Core choosing "bitcoin is a database" as the hill to die on. Shitcoiners are sharks and yall are choosing to chum the water at the beach.
2025-05-07 20:30:46 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply