The point of using multiple relays is censorship resistance. For censorship resistance to be a thing, the same post need to be on multiple relays and any two people who want to follow each other need to use multiple relays. > These would let relay owners moderate their own relays more completely. Why would you want any moderation whatsoever at the relay level? > be a paid relay That'd lead to even less adoption. People don't generally pay to be on social media. Not even very very little. Mainstream platforms handle this by having a business model where the non-paying users are what paying users are actually paying for. > And an app would just help people sign up and pick topics/communities they like, and then they would immediate have a main feed of strangers posting about things they actually are interested in. But what's of this that can't be achieved with either Nostr Communities or hashtags? > The communities could assist choose to be secret and not report to any people running a directory/app. To me this seems to be the only usecase of this. Why are big relays a problem?

Replies (1)

I wholeheartedly agree with everything here. Another issue I foresee with topic-specific relays is one of the problems Mastodon has, confusion about what to do and where to go. Not to mention, given how nostr works, there would be a LOT of unintentional cross-topic-relay posting that theoretically would result in bans and a bad experience for the end user. Moderators should only step in when there is something that violates the law in the jurisdiction where the relay is based. Big relays are only a problem insofar as big relays get all the new users, and as smaller relays die off it centralizes power and authority, which runs counter to what nostr stands for. Even if it's unintended. Paid relays on the other hand? No clue. Never subscribed to one, nor have I seen people say if they provide better content or not.