I second this. Shifting it to nostr would be great.

Bitcoin needs other implementations besides Core, and people vote with the implementation they run. Take the power out of a small group of devs.

Nostr FTW 100%... Having said that, "theariard" wasn't the guy who threw a tantrum a while ago and rage quit LN development, and now he's butthurt at Core developers?

This is really concerning. Especially the allegations that there's PRs that are intentionally introducing attacks on nodes from Core. Sounds like a new branch is needed maybe core devs have had a gun-to-head moment with the state. This also highlights the need for core contributors to stay anonymous. Craig Wright was a good incentive but this is another reminder.

You should really consider making an episode with contributors to shed light on this issue.

Yeah that's the guy.

I see a pattern there

Do you think opensats would sponsor somebody to build it? I think I laid out a reasonable rough vision on the ML.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Future of the bitcoin-dev mailing list - Ademan

* NIP-32 labels to post to a given group, and moderate entries in it * user selected moderator list * a markdown kind (might already exist, I haven't been keeping up) for discussion content * POW to overcome potential visibility issues * Archive client that looks like mailman archives Eventually it would need email integration via some kind of self-hostable bridge

What I am thinking is we should not run any new bitcoin core version until we have full transparency again.

Man, bitcointalk is so bad. But so well indexed by Google.