Thread - Nostr Hypermedia

Let me guess. It skims on top of austrian concepts we already know about, includes modern examples of outrageous cantilion next to fancy data graphs, and macro mumbo. All along it implies but never directly asserts a moral failing on behalf of amorphous elites while proposing no concrete alternatives or risk taking vision but does mention bitcoin somehow potentialy, maybe, fixing all this through equally amorphous assertions. #ourgirl

↑ Parent

Replies (6)

CensorThis thisistheend@nostriches.net 2 years ago

Well you’re absurdly rude @Cyber Seagull

1 replies ↓

Cyber Seagull 2 years ago

But not wrong

Lyn Alden lyn@primal.net 2 years ago

If that was what I set out to do, I wouldn’t have made it 538 pages. I would have made it half the length, which would result in way higher margins.

1 replies ↓

Cyber Seagull 2 years ago

I see maybe two chapters that tread on new ground. Time will tell. Best of luck. #getdatmoney #teamLyn

Hoshi 2 years ago

Sounds like you have seen a couple of books which fit this description. I wouldn’t like read something like that. Can you give me a list of books that I should avoid?

1 replies ↓

Cyber Seagull 2 years ago

No. They are great. Read all the bitcoin books. Read this one. Support the authors. Support Bitcoin media. My point is more along the lines of what Eric Weinstein asked on the WBD podcast. We know the problems, we know bitcoin might help. What world are we actually building ? Or as Zizek puts it: What happens the day after the revolution ?