Sakana AI
The Darwin Gödel Machine: AI that improves itself by rewriting its own code
These guys and some big AI companies are evolving their models towards better math and coding because those domains are provable. You can imagine what could go wrong if you let AI evolve itself towards more and more left brain stuff (hint: less and less beneficial knowledge/right brain stuff may remain because usually when the model gets better at one area, it loses in other areas).
I've built some tools that evolves AI towards human alignment. Started to fine tune Qwen 3. The evals of this work are similar to evals of AHA leaderboard. Soon there will be Qwen 3 models that are very aligned.
Previously I did Gemma 3 and it was failing on some runs, and resisting to learn certain domains. Lets see how Qwen 3 will do. It is a more skilled model and similar base AHA score to Gemma 3.
It is possible to 'define human alignment' and let AI evolve towards that when enough people contributes to this work. Let me know if you want to contribute and be one of the initial people that fixed AI. Symbiotic intelligence can be better than artificial general intelligence!
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Believe I've mentioned Mike Adams new LLM. . .Enoch to you in the past. He finally released it & made a few posts/videos about it recently. He specifically discussed his rationale on choosing Qwen in this one:
China will win the AI wars because USA tech companies are 'TARDED!
Sorry to say I don't really understand what you're doing (or your background) in the AI field, but my sense is that it's constructive & unselfish. . .and far beyond my own grasp. Mike's intent, intelligence and integrity, however, I'm much more familiar with. So, Very Curious as to any feedback you'd be willing to share on the podcast above and and experience with Enoch so far.
China will win the AI wars because USA tech companies are 'TARDED!
Brighteon.com is a leading online free platform that empowers free speech, allowing individuals to freely share videos and express their thoughts w...
We have similar goals yes. I like his work and eagerly waiting for his half aligned LLM to be open weighted.
My approach is bringing more humans into curation and judging other mainstream AIs like with a leaderboard, his approach is curating the AI himself. Overall we are serving the same purpose. Liberating humans from medical system, bad technologies, financial system, bad food industry etc.
My thought is once enough people starts curating the AI, we could say we are close to defining human alignment and hence we can hold other AI accountable if they stray away from this collective values of beneficial knowledge.
Qwen is a good model, currently more skilled than llamas and gemma. In terms of alignment it is worse than llama but if it doesn't resist training, folks may be able to push it in the right direction. Check my AHA leaderboard for exact scores:
China is against btc and nostr as we all know and their models may reflect that in the future. Qwen 3 is good at those and bad at healthy living.
For the video that you shared, i have similar thoughts, but don't agree with everything he says. I agree that there are a lot of problems in mainstream AI. And guys like us will be able to document and fix that.
Zoho Sheet