Everyone is free to do whatever they want, but I don’t understand to whom and to what are you referring to when you write about the “cancel-culture mob behavior”? I assume that you are referring to npub1hghnjjpnvkz8t6gkszuf37d7puwc2qtxc65rnklqsngzv6kkug9qhhfyz2 ‘s comment as you shared it in this context. If you are referring to his comment, then I don’t understand what is he doing wrong here? Is it somehow wrong to ask people, who are margin called because they took loans against their Bitcoin, to warn others? Or what is wrong about taking "a close note of the people/companies who created these products, who backed them and who shilled them”? Or what is wrong about thinking "long and hard about these products" so that one does "not risk getting rekt"? And if you are not referring to his comment and are referring to some real cancel-culture mob behavior, then let’s hear it.

Replies (1)

Kendy's avatar
Kendy 1 month ago
I doubt he’ll respond to you. But I’d bet he’s interpreting Daniel is claiming Jack’s business has poor ethics and encouraging others to agree. I believe Daniel is causing net harm and waste by distributing that message. Jack is a net good actor for Bitcoin and humanity and we all have SO MANY more enemies we should aim our time and energy at.