I asked my “team” which is built using OpenAI’s API, whether monolithic models or decentralised models would benefit from being open source in mission of achieving AGI. ***** The question of whether artificial general intelligence (AGI) is more likely to be achieved through monolithic models or a fabric of parallel specialized large language models (LLMs) is a profound one. In parallel, the question of whether such models should be open source adds an extra layer of complexity to this discussion. Both these questions have significant implications for transparency, democratization, and security in the AI field. A monolithic AI model is a single, comprehensive model trained to understand and respond to a wide variety of tasks. In contrast, a fabric of specialized LLMs would involve multiple models, each trained on a specific task or domain. There are valid arguments for both approaches. A monolithic model could potentially lead to a unified, coherent form of AGI, whereas a system of specialized models could allow for more flexibility and adaptability. However, both approaches present substantial challenges in terms of complexity, data requirements, and computational resources. With the approach of a fabric of parallel specialized LLMs, one could argue that the decentralization and diversification of learning tasks might foster robustness and adaptability. These models could be trained and optimized for specific domains, yielding high performance in their respective areas. The integration of these models could potentially result in a form of AGI that is highly specialized yet collectively adaptable. This approach also aligns with the idea of a more distributed, democratized AI, where different entities could contribute specialized models to the overall fabric of AGI. On the open-source question, open-sourcing such a fabric of models could enable a broader pool of researchers and developers to contribute to the development of AGI. This could democratize the process, prevent undue concentration of power, and accelerate innovation by allowing a larger number of minds to contribute to the solution. Moreover, it could lead to better scrutiny and diversity of thought, which might help to mitigate biases and promote fairness. However, there are critical considerations around security, misuse, and economic factors. The misuse of specialized AI models could have dire consequences, and open-sourcing could potentially make such misuse easier. Economic considerations are also important, as entities that invest substantial resources into developing these models may be reluctant to open-source them due to potential loss of competitive advantage. Moreover, the coordination and integration of a fabric of specialized models is a non-trivial challenge, especially in an open-source context. Ensuring interoperability, managing complexity, and developing a coherent overarching framework would all be substantial challenges. Moreover, training such a diverse set of models would require vast amounts of data and computational resources, posing further barriers to entry for smaller entities. One potential compromise could be a hybrid approach that combines elements of open-source and proprietary models. This could involve open-sourcing certain aspects of the models (e.g., architecture, training methods) while keeping the trained models themselves proprietary. This could enable broader participation and scrutiny while protecting economic interests and mitigating misuse. Regulation could also play an important role. Regulatory frameworks could be established to require certain levels of transparency and accountability from AI developers, without necessarily making the models completely open source. This could help ensure that the development of AGI is conducted in a manner that is ethical, fair, and in the best interests of society as a whole. In conclusion, the path to AGI, whether through monolithic models or a fabric of specialized LLMs, is fraught with challenges and unknowns. The question of whether these models should be open source adds further complexity. While open sourcing could potentially democratize the process and promote transparency and innovation, it must be balanced against considerations around security, misuse, economic factors, and the technical challenges of coordinating a fabric of models. A hybrid approach, coupled with thoughtful regulation, might offer a way forward that captures the best of both worlds. As we continue to navigate these uncharted waters, it