Not related to the bullshit comment above , but maybe one the biggest questions knots ppl have is: IF this change does bring the consequence of non-monetary tx pushing out monetary tx due to high fees and full blocks, is core going to “rewind” this change? Cause from some statements from core devs it seems that btc is a database for whatever the market wants it to be, and if the market wants it to be for non monetary tx then be it. I might be wrong but this seems to be the biggest concern from knots ppl, the fact that btc as PRIMARILY a monetary network is not a given Cheers

As far as I can tell all Bitcoin Core contributors are only interested in Bitcoin as a monetary system, although some are more excited about nascent scaling technologies than others. We've seen at least three waves of data transaction uses get priced out of Bitcoin so far, and just because a sober assessment indicates that it will always be possible to embed data in the Bitcoin block chain doesn't mean that any Bitcoin Core developers are motivated by that. That said, I have in 12 years not seen a mempool policy tightening, especially not against any transaction types that had more than vanishing demand. I'm not convinced it's feasible without making it financially attractive to break rank. If you have some time and are open to reading more, I thought Antoine's responses to various concerns were well laid out here:

Delving Bitcoin

Addressing community concerns and objections regarding my recent proposal to relax Bitcoin Core's standardness limits on OP_RETURN outputs

Hi everyone. I recently proposed that Bitcoin Core lifts its standardness limits on OP_RETURN outputs. The reason is that they are not binding any...