Absolutely, that is the traditional definition of magic that we generally mean by the term. Then there is a newer definition of magic: to cause change in accordance with one's will. These are naturally two completely different definitions and I agree with you that without clarification we should assume the traditional definition that involves superstition. Though, the two different definitions aside, the ethical distinctions of black magic vs white magic are still relevant if we make parallels to today's society. Black magic, could in its ethos be defined as any enforced protocol (think restraint of free agency) that disregards informed, voluntary consent and thereby removes individual sovereignty. In this light, we can view CBDC's, fiat money and social credit scores from the lens of the black magic ethos: they are based on force, pressure and compulsion, designed to carry out a political agenda while disregarding voluntary, informed consent and sovereign decisionmaking.