55% is self evidently not consensus and is unprecedented. There has always been and will always be spam on bitcoin and nothing that's being proposed by this divisive bip will prevent it. What it would do, if successful, which it won't be, is set a precedent for hasty, contentious forks that introduce new rules and limits with a low threshold that's sure to create a minority fork. This is a great way for low information "bitcoiners" to lose their value on, just like every other minority fork in bitcoin's history. The lower threshold only ensures it will turn out worse than the others. Watch your fork pump and then dump to be worth a tiny % of the value (usage, exchange rate, users, hashrate, etc.) just like BCH and BSV, as holders dump their minority bonus shitcoin dividend and swap them for bitcoin. Also, stop "arguing" like a little girl. Making cute mean names for people you oppose and throwing unsubstantiated claims around is not an argument. Your not winning anyone of value over with that tactic, only emotional tribal morons. Learn history or repeat it. Your choice.