This seems to be a semantic argument.
I’m sure you realize no one can force anyone else to run rules/policy/“consensus” that they disagree with. Even if they are bitcoin core devs.
The Bitcoin network is run by users. There is no leader
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I agree with your last post here. The thinking of most core developers is that there is no point in maintaining an option that effectively achieves nothing. It is compared with a placebo. If transactions make it into blocks anyway, and there is no physical resource consumption downside, what is the point of keeping them out of the mempool?