Again, is there an *applicable* attack on NIP-04? There are good reasons to remove it (unifying encryption standards) but it is not the boogeyman you present it as.

I am not presenting anything. Several cryptographers did in multiple discussions. Fiatjaf built nip04 without any deeper knowledge in encryption. That alone should be a massive red flag. I don't understand this need you have to keep defending a lausy spec. Especially when others specs are readily available and have been fully vetted.