I don’t want to play the contrarian here below, but I have to say it. Okay, Bukele, the Bitcoin Dictator, is both very ugly and very bad. And has to be said. And yet this so-called "liberal democracy" ever praised by the Oslo Freedom Forum (sponsored by Amazon and Meta, two of the most dystopian technocorporations out there) feels so much like Fukuyama’s “End of History”—with those 1990s “prosciutto-filled eyes.” Unfortunately, it’s 2026. The world has moved on, and—after 2001 (the terrorist crisis that replace liberty with security), 2008 (the economic crisis that showed everybody the financial con game we live in), and 2020 (the health crisis that opened up the current techno totalitarian age)—we’ve finally learned (thanks Epstein) that the elites of these so-called “Oceania” democracies love children so much they cook them for dinner while they debate how to conquer Eurasia, or how to massively implant chips in their “citizens’” brains for their safety, or how they try to propagate their dna via surrogate slave mothers. And that all the great Western democracies are, in one way or another, plutocratic vassals of the Anglo-American Empire—ruled by a small circle of sociopathic satanist oligarchs, who are in turn controlled by an even smaller circle of all-powerful Zionist banksters. But maybe I'm just a schizo-tinfoil hat.

Replies (3)

Dictators can be very good or very bad. Under a dictatorship, if bad decisions are made, or good people are harmed or enslaved, you know exactly who did it. Liberal democracy is pretty much guaranteed to be very bad -- and is nearly always run by shadowy (and usually Jewish) stringpullers behind the scenes, making overthrowing the bad actors much harder because the average person doesn't have the IQ to even perceive how he has been enslaved. So bad actors massively favor democracy over any other form of government.