This to me is one, if not the most important, aspect of open source software. If we can’t rely on others with more skill to criticize and point out things that we may not notice , or have the skills to understand, wtf is the point of open source.
The beauty of nostr, is that once something is pointed out, if you don’t like it, you switch clients. Clean break, no take backs, no sloppy retreads.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
🎯
Yes and no.
It’s not that simple. There are some things are stickier than you may realize.
Once something is built, even if it’s bad, it takes a lot of force to dismantle it. Even more so if people are using it. Now you have to convince people it’s in their interest and the public’s interest for them to leave, along with the force of demo.
I’m still torn on the OS argument, especially as building becomes easier and easier.