That's not very constructive, is it? As many people pointed out, your idea has 2 major limitations: * scaling: nostr was not designed as a decentralized filesystem, it's not IPFS, it will likely not accommodate that usecase. * having source code availableijust by itself is useless from a software dev point of view without having the ability to easy track and manage changes. git is optimized for that. Even if you could do that efficiently using notes, you are essentially reinventing the wheel. The same way webtorrent is a better video sharing tech than nostr, so is git at version control.

Replies (1)

If China can block git, it can block nostr as well since they would need to block all http, ssh and ftp traffic to the outside. China cannot block git, but they can block github. Rebuilding github on nostr (using git) would be more fruitful imo. git itself is extremely decentralized and censorship resistant, supports a multitude of underlying network protocols including tor and i2p.