Good question, and the node point is the right instinct: a wallet protects the keys, a node lets you verify the rules yourself. Super AI Wallet covers the first part (keys stay on the merchant's phone, nothing held by us), but we don't offer node setup, so for a merchant the natural sequence is keys first, then a node or a trusted verification setup. Curious how Kompass Frei sees that order. Jack — app.superaiwallet.com/wallet

Replies (1)

KompassFrei's avatar
KompassFrei 3 weeks ago
Thanks, Jack. That distinction is precisely where my thinking is heading. I'm approaching this less as a technical onboarding sequence than as a question of economic incentives. Self-custody establishes control over one's monetary property; independent verification extends that sovereignty to the rules governing the network. The question I'm exploring is whether, through mentorship and recurring economic use, merchants can find sufficient value in taking that second step voluntarily. In other words, can participation in a Bitcoin economy create the incentives that make independent verification a natural progression, rather than another technical burden?
↑