* purview

From: pablof7z<-DerekRoss at 06/11/23 10:35:06 on wss://relay.damus.io > ...you’re constructing it in a way [that makes it] incredibly difficult for a client to parse all this ambiguous text into something sensible. It's a free nostr, you don't have to parse it. I'm certainly not parsing it. The bottom line is that there are going to be a vast number of different clients. Each client will be pursuing it's own particular use cases for nostr. Some of those use cases will be relatively incompatible with others. C'est la vie! The last thing we want is some kind of fixed UI standard that every client must adhere to. Such a standard would almost certainly restrict the number of possible use cases and make nostr a lot less free. So, if you don't want to propogate the subject tag, don't propogate it. If you don't want to parse the embedded replies, don't parse them. If you want to use highligher, use highlighter. It's a free nostr. CC: #[4] CC: #[5] CC: #[6] CC: #[7] CC: #[8] CC: #[9]

Gossip used to do this, but somehow it got lost in the UI shuffle. I would like to see it come back one day, the ability to at least untag those people you mention in the note, so they aren't alerted that you are talking about them.