๐•ž๐•ช๐•ก๐•’๐•ฅ๐•™๐•ฅ๐• ๐•—๐•š๐•ฃ๐•–'s avatar
๐•ž๐•ช๐•ก๐•’๐•ฅ๐•™๐•ฅ๐• ๐•—๐•š๐•ฃ๐•– mypathtofire@iris.to 2 months ago
I did, you used a logical fallacy. Therefore you need to check your line of reasoning! LOL. Of course It makes sense to filter >80 byte data as Bitcoin is money and not data storage!? Its in the name. Allowing 100kb of uncensored data onchain allows complete files of CP. Why wouldnt you filter it? Even if it was just a cat jpeg, why wouldnt you filter it? why has Cores position on spam and data storage changed? There is no need to mid curve this image
โ†‘ Parent

Replies (5)

Zaikaboy's avatar
Zaikaboy 2 months ago
You didn't but that's OK. This is a mountain out of a mole hill situation. It is a cock fight between hurt egos. I'm amazed there are people falling for it. Unfortunately unless the bitcoin keys loser gets a hell of a lot of minors to back him, its going nowhere.
1 replies โ†“
๐•ž๐•ช๐•ก๐•’๐•ฅ๐•™๐•ฅ๐• ๐•—๐•š๐•ฃ๐•–'s avatar
๐•ž๐•ช๐•ก๐•’๐•ฅ๐•™๐•ฅ๐• ๐•—๐•š๐•ฃ๐•– mypathtofire@iris.to 2 months ago
Technically it might not be a huge change, but it has been a needed discussion as it will move Bitcoin toward the next soft fork to remove spam and future attack vectors. Clearly the current Core "maintainers" need to leave the project or it will be replaced by others who dont view CP as a valid transaction. The huge move to Knots validates that.
1 replies โ†“
Zaikaboy's avatar
Zaikaboy 2 months ago
So not huge. How many of this not huge signal run both node types? I know several people that do. I'm glad you are self assured. I hope this storm in a tea cup is resolved amicably and with no one getting rekt. Good luck mate
โ†‘