I have said absolutely nothing of the sort and I can't possibly understand how you pulled that from anything I have said. I simply ask for someone to give some evidence or some actual useful information as to what "captured" means and how anything that has happened has resulted in "capture." But that's never given, they just say "this exists, thus captured," literally without defining what that means or how what they point out means it... Which your comment is another decent example of. You don't back it up, you just use my lack of acceptance of this default, reasonless logic, as evidence of some absurd statement like "you just think there can never be any negative impact," a literal light years leap away from demanding some sort of evidence as to what the negative impact is in any material sense and how it means bitcoin is "captured."