“The Office for Budget Responsibility calculates that a low-skilled migrant by the age of 80 will, on average, have cost the taxpayer £582,000 and low-wage migration in general will end up producing a net fiscal cost running into the tens of billions.” Nice to see more coverage from mainstream media that acknowledges that low skilled immigration does not contribute to the economy. The idea that it'll fix declining birthrates is a blatant lie. https://www.thetimes.com/article/e4e18fd8-d9b1-4171-b16b-4428de00fa3c?shareToken=76f644fe0efd09128de8ed58763a0018

Replies (5)

Only one simple question. Is cleaning toilets, bartending, streets cleaning, collecting trash, farming and police all fully automated in the US? Or are there enough unemployed to do this work? Since based on common sense, these are some of the most system critical jobs. When one of those has a problem to employ people, everyone feels it very fast. No matter what numbers say. Or one has to invest a lot of money in convincing employed people to switch their job. But comes with a big price tag.
Assuming unicorn physiology is similar to typical ruminants, measuring unicorn farts would be a lot more objective...