Yeah definitely some sour grapes in there but scaling up FOSS grants incentivizes grant orgs to find efficiencies. The difference between 'efficiencies' and 'shortcuts' is a matter of perspective.
I don't have any hard evidence and I don't expect to ever find it but if you follow the incentives it's not a stretch to believe this happens.
I've seen folks low key take shots at me for my github profile having 'fake projects' and 'fake commits'. Those are lazy takes confirming a preexisting bias. These folks don't yet grok that green squares are a gameable metric. We should help them understand by gaming them harder in a more widespread manner.
I also think there's a big opportunity to grow ngit and similar projects by introducing similar gameable metrics. I hope someone looks into it seriously.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Oh, you hope to Trojan horse ngit (I assume turnover nostr) by making it MORE gamable? Thats diabolical.
And, I hate the types that thrive in these gamable type environments. I can almost visualize them. Fake nerds!
I feel I'd be a good angel investor. Alas, I'm not rich enough. Have a zap in the meantime.