See Below. From: pablof7z<-DerekRoss at 06/11/23 07:57:53 on wss://atlas.nostr.land CC: #[4] CC: #[5] CC: #[6] CC: #[7] >--------------- >Why include the body of what you’re responding in emails’ broken format of > quotes? I do that so that I can respond to questions and statements in a structured way. Most of nostr is clinging to a twitter mindset where notes are one or two sentences long. I have hopes that nostr will grow beyond that kind of limited thinking and allow very salient in-line discussions. >A tagged event already provides the quoted text in a far superior/structured way The tags help the clients to construct the threads; but the tags do not help the reader understand which part of a note the responder is referring to. Again, the twitter mindset is a tough habit to break; but one that I think we should break as soon as possible. > >This looks broken I agree that it looks broken. Looks are the responsibility of the client.

If you do >SPACE instead of just >, we can treat it as markdown and render it better.